Daimler, Ferrari escape Formula One Halo suit – World IP Review

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. Continue if you are OK with this or read more in our privacy policy. 
Rory O’Neill
Daimler, Ferrari escape Formula One Halo suit
Gaschwald / Shutterstock.com

A Texas federal judge has shielded automobile makers from patent infringement claims, leaving the regulator and owners of Formula One to face the lawsuit.
Norwegian inventor Jens Nygaard sued Formula One as well as car manufacturers including Ferrari and Daimler, and decorated racing driver Lewis Hamilton.
The claims relate to the Halo safety device installed in Formula One racing cars, designed to protect drivers in the event of a crash.
Nygaard claims he engaged with Formula One for years to try and have his patented Halo design installed in racing cars—and when they eventually were, he was not compensated.
But since the suit was filed last year, the US District Court for the Western District of Texas has whittled down a lengthy list of defendants which included racing drivers and teams.
The court dismissed the suits against Hamilton and fellow F1 driver Charles Leclerc under the customer-suit exception, which protects end-product consumers from being sued for patent infringement.
The court has now invoked this same doctrine to dismiss claims against Ferrari, Mercedes owner Daimler, and the Mercedes-Benz Grand Prix team. The February 18 decision follows the dismissal of claims against Red Bull’s racing team earlier this month.
Mercedes and Daimler also informed the court on Friday, February 19 that it had filed a petition to cancel Nygaard’s Halo patent at the US Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The PTAB is expected to decide whether to institute inter partes review in August this year.
Patent infringement claims remain outstanding against Formula One’s management company, as well as its governing body, the Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile.
Last August, Formula One was rebuffed in its efforts to block a trademark application which it claimed would cause confusion with the ‘F1’ brand.
The UK Intellectual Property Office ruled that sports brand owner Bux & Co’s ‘F1T’ trademark was unlikely to cause confusion in the market place.
Did you enjoy reading this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox
Today’s top stories
Vodafone appeal loss clarifies govt use of IP
Ford CEO urges LG to settle with rival battery supplier
Burberry wins prelim injunction against Chinese ‘Baneberry’ brand
Formula One, Halo, Daimler, Ferrari, Lewis Hamilton, racing, cars, driver, safety, Charles Leclerc
Ferrari wins key design case against ‘tuning’ kits
Child car seat manufacturers battle over patents in US suit
Formula One collides with UKIPO over F1 trademark
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
United Kingdom
Email[email protected]

Receive daily emails from WIPR


Leave a Comment

Ads Blocker Image Powered by Code Help Pro

Ads Blocker Detected!!!

Welcome to FactsPrime

Sorry, We have detected that you have activated Ad-Blocker. Please Consider supporting us by disabling your Ad Blocker, It helps us in maintaining this website. To View the content, Please disable adblocker and refresh the page.

Thank You !!!